Books, films, and general observations
Feb. 16th, 2008 08:18 amHmm - I just used an Oxford comma in the title of this post without thinking about it - I believe I usually do.
Anway, I am currently very busy at work, which has meant the loss of my lunch hour, and thus 40 minutes of my usual reading time per day - eek! So, I don't think I'll be reaching 104 books this year. However, I seem to be inadvertently compensating for this by reading particularly short books, which I suppose could be construed as cheating - but I don't really care!
The general observation part of this post has to do with a poster I saw the other day for Lost. It said in giant letters across the top - "ANSWERS ARE COMING", to which I responded with a derisive snort and a, "Yeah, right!" J J Abrams has a mystery box of magic tricks that he bought as a child and has not opened in fifteen years. I read an article about him, in which one of the production crew on Lost said that he is much more interested in the concept of a mystery than in the explanation of it. And, as I understand it, nothing was explained in Cloverfield. I think it's time we all came to terms with the fact that Lost is never going to become clear. Now, this doesn't bother me in the slightest - unusually for me, I'm happy with the mystery of Lost just being a mystery - but I know an awful lot of people who won't be nearly as content!
On to the reviews:
Anway, I am currently very busy at work, which has meant the loss of my lunch hour, and thus 40 minutes of my usual reading time per day - eek! So, I don't think I'll be reaching 104 books this year. However, I seem to be inadvertently compensating for this by reading particularly short books, which I suppose could be construed as cheating - but I don't really care!
The general observation part of this post has to do with a poster I saw the other day for Lost. It said in giant letters across the top - "ANSWERS ARE COMING", to which I responded with a derisive snort and a, "Yeah, right!" J J Abrams has a mystery box of magic tricks that he bought as a child and has not opened in fifteen years. I read an article about him, in which one of the production crew on Lost said that he is much more interested in the concept of a mystery than in the explanation of it. And, as I understand it, nothing was explained in Cloverfield. I think it's time we all came to terms with the fact that Lost is never going to become clear. Now, this doesn't bother me in the slightest - unusually for me, I'm happy with the mystery of Lost just being a mystery - but I know an awful lot of people who won't be nearly as content!
On to the reviews: